photographing a beach ceremony…
posted on Wednesday, October 10, 2007 in Photographers LaCour
Today's post comes from an amazing team of photographers located in Atlanta Ga, LaCour Photography. I asked my friends to submit an image or two along with a dramatic story to go along with the theme of this blog, creative off camera lighting. Mark Adams has one killer image along with a unique story and tops it off by shooting in one of the most challenging of all shooting conditions:
Beach Ceremony at night with NO available light.
Mark Adams writes:
When we were asked to photograph a small, intimate wedding ceremony at sunset in Laguna Beach, we expected beautiful California light. But a few hours before sunset, we learned that the minister's flight was delayed. The bride and groom made the decision to still have the ceremony on the beach at whatever time the minister arrived, which was definitely going to be after sunset. So we were presented with the challenge of photographing a beach ceremony at night with no available light.
Before becoming a wedding photographer, I worked for newspapers and magazines, shooting assignments all over the world. One of the things I had to get good at quickly was learning to adjust to any situation no matter what the challenges and no matter what the lighting conditions. As a news photographer, I simply had to make sure I came back with good pictures that documented the action without interfering or altering the mood.
The problem with flash is that it can be a distraction, especially when you're photographing in complete darkness as we were. But in situations like this, there's not much you can do about that pop of bright white light. The ambient exposure was between 20-30 seconds. That doesn't work for capturing expressions on people's faces. But what we did do was simply minimize the amount of flash we used. Rather than shooting a ton of photos and creating a strobe-like disco, we simply waited, anticipated the key moments and shot those moments, which were just a handful of photos.
My wife Erin stood back near the rocks behind the minister and shot photos with direct flash to get the "safe" shots of the bride and groom's reactions and emotion. That freed me up to try to make a photo that showed the uniqueness of the ceremony. I wanted to make a photo that captured the mood of the moonlit scene. So I steadied my Canon 5D with a 16-35mm f/2.8L USM at 27mm on my Gitzo Mountaineer tripod. I set a base exposure in manual mode for 10 seconds at f/2.8 at ISO 400, which was about one stop underexposed from a reading off the sky. I then set my on-camera Canon 580EX to Master and also set it to not participate in the exposure, and then I signaled Erin to switch her on-camera Canon 580EX to Slave. Then I released the shutter. I shot about three frames this way. The Canon E-TTL technology worked flawlessly and allowed us to quickly set up this shot and execute it swiftly without having to fiddle with manually setting the power on the remote flash.
Most of the other photos from the short ceremony (less than 10 minutes) were shot with direct flash, no diffusion, but this photo does a couple of things for us. 1) It captures the mood of the ceremony 2) Shows the ceremony environment and 3) Adds diversity to the wedding album.
If all the photos from this ceremony had unique lighting, this photo wouldn't look as dramatic when shown next to all the other images. Just as we try to diversify the type of images we shoot, we need to diversify the type of lighting that we look for or create.
But most importantly, this image reflects what I felt being a part of the ceremony and this image is an accurate representation of that moment.


-Mark Adams | LaCour
Also, The LaCour team are hosting one amazing series of workshops that are a 4 day intensive series that WILL change your career. Check out their workshops: http://lacourphoto.net/workshops/
They also have a blog dedicated to help photographers...check them out! www.lacourphoto.net
Cheers & Thanks LaCour for sharing your awesome idea!
Matt
25 comments for "photographing a beach ceremony at night with no available light"
wow! very interesting story. Love this photo, great shot!
I found the older couple on the right a little distarting though
Frank,
I noticed that too and I am betting that the shadow you are seeing is Erin with a 70-200 mounted on the camera.
Great shot Mark!
I just checked with Erin and she remembers holding the flash above her - and probably a little behind her - which would explain her shadow. As for the fill light, the sand seemed to be a great reflector because I didn't use another flash for fill. I did shoot a few frames with the master set to participate in the exposure, but those looked pretty crummy compared to just using that one backlight. Yay for reflective sand! It worked almost as well as snow.
Great shot, I love it. I was also wondering about the shadow to the Priest's camera right, and is there another light source providing some fill? They seem bright for a one stop under sky reading, I'd have expected more of a silhouette, maybe the sand reflects more than I'm envisioning it would.
Mark, way to make the best of a situation. There are several stories within a story in this image. One of the funniest is where the aunt (on the right) is doing what appears to be her checking the time :) It looks like Erin was holding the flash high, in her left hand and slightly behind herself, quite possibly while she was standing facing toward you. I can see her shadow, which adds a neat element to the image. The rim lighiting on most of the guests in attendance, while lighting the couple and minister more fully is a cool effect.
Thanks for sharing,
Frank
An amazing image! Balance, composition, lighting all working so beautifully. The only element I can't figure is the shadow to the Priest's right side. Was Erin in-front of the 580? Is that her shadow? Is the light on a stand behind her? Thanks!
John,
Good question about motion blur. In this particular frame, it just happens that everyone was tanding pretty much completely still for the entire exposure. There's a smidgen of ghosting near the back of the grandmother's (seated) head, so it looks like she must've moved her head up at the very tail end of the exposure. A couple of the other frames I made had quite a bit of motion as people were moving around more. Take a look at one of those frames, which I made earlier than the image included in this blog post: http://www.lacourphoto.com/photos/DIG2007020201-0497.jpg You can see that I was closer to the grandmother and that they were moving more, as well as the woman in pink - it looks like she was actually walking around - but the rest of the people didn't seem to move much. I knew that being closer to the subjects would magnify the smallest bit of motion blur, which is one of the reasons I moved back (plus I liked the composition better) and shot a few more exposures. The photo included in the blog post just seemed to work at the perfect moment when everybody was remarkably still. Hope that helps.
This is one of those situation where you really wish Canon could have come forward and gave us more details about how its TTL work .Its frustrating to seem to understand it ( as an IR trigger mechanism ) but to have situation like this that gives you results that cant be repeated.............Great situation like this :)
I am venting my frustration becos I just about made up my mind to get a Elinchrom radio trigger and then find that maaaybe i should just get another Canon Flash :(
This is really impressive work, considering the non existence of light and the shortness of the ceremony. Well done!
Mark, you guys rock as usual! I just LOVE the "outside the box" thinking on this one, it's always amazing to see LaCour images! Think I'd better go practice my "dungeon" lighting now, we've got more of those than beaches here!
Really like the image and your ability to adapt to the lighting (or lack there of) environment. With a 10 second exposure, how were you able to not have any motion blur with the folks in the wedding party, yet able to work in some ambient light? thanks
Nice shot especially considering the circumstances.
Tony, the infrared triggering system is a little finicky. It's not as consistent as using a pocket wizard radio remote, but I find that it works well for me most of the time. It doesn't always have to be line of sight (but it usually does), and this was one of those instances where it worked. Usually you can get away without it being line of sight when you're indoors as the infrared seems to bounce around off walls and such. Outside like this, it's usually less predictable, but I've found if the slave flash is just slightly behind something, that I can get it to work. I wish the Canon strobes had radio built into them instead of infrared, but what can you do. Just experiment with what works and what doesn't, so that when you go into situations, you'll know if you need to plug your flash into a pocket wizard or not. Hopefully this helps.
Tony,
thanks for commenting! I'll try to step in and shed some light on your question. Mark, please feel free to elaborate if you have more thoughts..
I have used Canon's TTL before and find that the slaves don't necessarily need to be in direct line of sight of the master... I've even had them trigger around corners... Its a sensitive process but with some practice, you will make some awesome images with this technique, as you can see!
Cheers!
matt
Outstanding shot!
But how did you get the slave to fire? I can't see it in the photo, so how could its sensor have seen the master?
Mark,
Always impressed by your work, this image is really amazing, BUT... way to put everybody to work and look at the manual of the flash!!, c'mon! we were expecting the magic formula here man! .. haha... jk... Way to keep me inspired! Saludos! :)
Thanks everyone!
For setting the master to not participate in the exposure, check out page 36 of your 580EX's manual on how to disable your master flash from participating in the exposure. But you press the zoom button and then cycle through the options. There's a blinking flash lightning icon and you can toggle between "off" and "on." Choose "off." Note that it will still emit a preflash, which is what triggers the off-camera flash(es).
Erin was actually in front of the rocks, but behind the the group of people on the right of the picture, so yes behind the group of people that includes the lady in the pink dress.
I like the couple on the right, too. That's the grandmother and uncle. I like that it's a little bit different than just a group of people standing.
Wow...amazing photo. It speaks a million words. I love it!
Fabulous work guys!
This is one of my favorite lighting shots ever! Freakin' awesome!
Wow.
IMO it's the older couple on the right (parents?) that lifts this from a really cool image to something wonderful.
Was Erin behind the rocks directly in line with the lady in the pink dress? Nice work keeping her out of the shot ;)
Mark, Great story and I have SO much respect for your ability to think on your toes and create a shot that brought some super FLAVOR to this sequence of images. I know this one will make the full spread in their album!
Maybe you can elaborate on how to set the on cam 580 to "not participate" in the exposure!
Thanks again for the killer submission!
matt
Awesome, of course. :) What's that button that turns the master flash off again?? set it to pre-flash or something...?
I've loved this shot for a while...it's great to hear the entire story behind it. Great job guys.
Great shot, Mark! What I love about it is that's it's not overdone. There's enough ambient light to allow the reality of the image to come through. Yet, the lines created by the backlighting draw you into the subjects.